|
MOUNTAINTOP REMOVAL
- MTR
What is
Mountaintop Removal? Mountaintop removal is
just what the name suggests. Peaks are cleared of trees. Often hardwood trees are simply burned for convenience. Giant steam
shovels then scrape away the topsoil. The rock beneath is blasted away
until the coal is exposed. Some blasts have lopped as much as 800 feet
off a mountain.
Tons of rocks, debris and other waste are trucked away and dumped into
valley areas. The overburden is often scraped into the adjacent
drainage valleys in what is called a valley fill.
Regulations
dating from the Reagan
administration, said that no surface mining may occur within 100 feet
of a stream unless there'd be no harm to water quality or quantity.
Data suggests that mountaintop mining accounts for 10% of America's
coal output providing 5% of its electricity.
Mountaintop
removal has become an increasingly contentious issue over the past several particularly
in the southern United States. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) estimated that by the end of 2010, 1.4 million acres of Appalachian
forests would have been disturbed or cleared by mountaintop removal, an
area larger than Delaware.
_______________________________________________ Latest news: April
23 2013: EPA’s veto on West Virginia MTR project legal. U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit confirms EPA's contention that the Clean Water Act's Section
404 grants the agency authority to scrap specifications in dredge-and-fill
permits issued by the Army Corps of Engineers for Arch Coal Inc.'s Spruce No. 1
mine in Logan County, W.Va. The ruling reverses U.S. District Judge Amy Berman
Jackson's decision last year that threw out EPA's veto. link
_______________________________________________
Below: - EPA action
- Government oversight
- Around Appalachia
July 2011: EPA issues final mountaintop mining guidance. U.S. EPA
Administrator Lisa Jackson has said that "no or very few valley
fills" would be approved under new guidance that EPA regional offices will
now impose on state regulators for permits under the federal Clean Water Act. The announcement pleases
environmentalists, but criticized by
industry. link
Spruce Mine in West Virginia - a test case on EPA authority.
March 2012: Largest MTR project allowed. A federal judge has reversed a decision by the EPA to revoke a
critical permit for one of the nation’s largest mountaintop removal mining
projects. Judge Berman said that the E.P.A.’s unilateral decision in January
2011 to rescind the waste disposal permit for the Spruce No. 1 mine in Logan
County, West Virginia, exceeded the agency’s authority and violated federal law. She
declared that the permit was now valid, paving the way for a mining project
covering 2,278 acres to go forward. In 2007 the E.P.A. said that mining would
have done unacceptable damage to rivers, wildlife and communities. link (Note - judgement reversed - see latest news) January 2011: Veto on West Virginia Spruce mine project. The Obama administration vetoes one of the biggest coal projects in the US in a historic decision against mountaintop removal practices.
The agency said it was the first time it has revoked a previously
issued permit in 40 years, but the action was warranted because thye
environmental damage was truly unacceptable. link |
April 2010: EPA raises the bar for mountaintop mining The Obama administration effectively called time today on one of the most
destructive industries in America, proposing new environmental guidelines for
mountaintop mining removal. The move was seen as a bold action from the White House, which has in the
past disappointed environmental organizations for failing to move more
aggressively on pollution and climate change. In a conference call with journalists officials spelled out guidelines that they
acknowledged would make it virtually impossible for mining companies in
Appalachia to carry on with business as usual. link April 2010: Putting EPA's decision in perspective - Matt Wasson, Director of Programs for Appalachian Voices, writes - To the extent that some in the media overstated the impact of the EPA's new
guidance, they can be forgiven. During the press conference, Jackson
said, "You're talking about no or very few valley fills that are going to meet
standards like this." The EPA's move is a big first step that provides immediate protection to
Appalachian families threatened with new mountaintop removal permits above their
homes. It's a tourniquet that will stop the hemorrhaging, but here are five
reasons why this guidance doesn't immediately or permanently put an end to
mountaintop removal . . . more April 2010: Interior Department moving to curb coal mining pollution. The
Interior Department is writing new regulations for mountaintop-removal
coal mining that would expand protection for waterways and require the
restoration of dynamited areas. Also states' rights to set their own
standards for granting exemptions would be revoked, and a federal
definition for "material damage" to watersheds would be
established. link
National campaign to end Mountain Top Removal coal mining kicks off. June 2009: 14 people were arrested in Coal River, WV for protesting
mountain top removal coal mining at an elementary school only a few hundred
yards from a recently erected toxic coal sludge impoundment. The arrested
include retired coal miner and former Congressman Ken Hechler, NASA climate
scientist James Hansen, Goldman Environmental Prize Winner Judy Bonds, and
actress Daryl Hannah. Bonds was actually assaulted by a Massey Coal employee,
who was in turn arrested for battery. Sierra Club |
Past background by the Bush & Obama administrations. During the Bush Administration, EPA never opposed or challenged a permit,
despite the fact that they clearly violated laws on the books to protect clean
water and public health. Apparently, those days are over. A dramatic
announcement by EPA that every single one of the 79 pending permits violates the
Clean Water Act is a condemnation of the quality of permits being churned out
during the Bush Administration and is a testament to the Obama Administration’s
sincere commitment to science, transparency, and enforcing environmental
safeguards.The Army Corps now has 60 days to revise the permits and address EPA’s concerns.
link
October 2008: In the waning days of the Bush
administration, the Interior Department's Office
of Surface Mining issued a final environmental analysis
that would ease restrictions on dumping mountaintop mining waste near
rivers and streams, modifying protections that have been in place,
though often circumvented, for a quarter-century. The proposed rule change had been under consideration for four years
and was a priority of the surface mining industry. The
rule change essentially would eliminate the buffer by allowing the
government to grant waivers so that mining companies can dump the
rubble from mountaintops into valleys, burying streams. read
April 2009: The
Obama administration's reversal of that last-minute Bush rule
was a blow to the coal industry, which defends
mountaintop mining as a safer, cheaper alternative to traditional
underground mining. Interior
Secretary Ken Salazar said he had asked the Justice Department to ask a
federal court in Washington, DC, to throw out the rule and
send it
back to the EPA. Mr. Salazar said the rule "simply doesn't pass muster
with respect to adequately protecting water quality and stream habitat"
in affected communities. link Who controls the permits for MTR - the EPA or Army Corps of Engineers? In February 2009, overturning a lower court's ruling, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based
in coal-friendly Virginia, found that the Corps does indeed have the
power to issue mountaintop permits without broader reviews. Adora Andy, spokeswoman for the EPA, said there were between 150 and 200 permits
on backlog awaiting the 4th Circuit decision. If approved, those projects would
impact at least 211 miles of streams in West Virginia and Kentucky, according to
Margaret Janes, senior policy analyst for the Appalachian Center for the Economy
& the Environment, who analyzed 102 of the permits. Peggy Noel, spokeswoman for the Corps' Huntington district, said the EPA's
recent letters don't change the task or the direction of her office, where it's
"just business as usual." Noel continued, "We are a neutral agency. We're not for [the mines]; we're
not against them. We're just here to evaluate and approve permits."
The EPA and other departments responsible for clean water laws will now subject all
applications for mountaintop-mining permits - routinely fast-tracked for the
last few years - to rigorous, case-by-case environmental review. These agencies
will also exercise stronger control over state regulators. But it still leaves in place the destructive Bush
rules that essentially legalized the practice of dumping harmful waste in
valleys and streams. The Obama administration has pledged to restore the old
buffer zone restriction. But it has said nothing at all about redefining mining
waste as an illegal pollutant, which it was before the Bush people came along. A
bill before the House would do exactly that. The administration should do it
first - New York Times, June 20 2009. link
Appalachia. Mining
operations have blasted away hundreds of peaks in West Virginia, eastern Kentucky and Tennessee and have permanently altered stream
flows and wildlife habitats in those watersheds, according to studies
by the Environmental Protection Agency. Mountaintop removal opponents
have cited those studies in court papers. (Above - Mountaintop coal mining operation in
West Virginia.) Mountaintop
removal accounts for a third of West Virginia's coal production. The
technique has been around since the 1970s. More
than 700 miles of streams across central Appalachia were buried by
valley fills from 1985 to 2001, according to a 2005 EPA report. The
report says that, without further restrictions, 2,200 square miles of
Appalachian forests - an area twice the size of Rhode Island - will be
eliminated by 2012. Without the ability to fill valleys with the rocky
debris, mountaintop mining can't be performed. Lower-court decisions
found that permits issued by the Army Corps of Engineers violated the
Clean Water Act. link
| Since
1992, nearly 2,000 miles of Appalachian streams have been buried by
mining refuse. Furthermore, nine out of every ten streams downstream
from surface mining operations have been found to be polluted. |
August 2010: New maps reveal massive forest loss in Appalachia.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that by the
end of 2010, 1.4 million acres of Appalachian forests will have been
disturbed or cleared by mountaintop removal, an area larger than Delaware. link July 2009: Mountaintop mining legacy: Destroying Appalachian streams. Of all the environmental problems caused by mountaintop projects - decapitated
peaks, deforestation, the significant carbon footprint, scientists have found
that valley fills do the most damage because they destroy headwater streams and
surrounding forests, which are crucial to the workings of mountain ecosystems. link August 2011: Opposition to MTR in coal heartland. Appalachian voters in the heart of coal country
oppose mountaintop removal coal mining, according to a poll released by
Earthjustice, Appalachian Mountain Advocates and the Sierra Club. The poll
sampled 1,315 registered voters in Kentucky, West Virginia, Virginia and
Tennessee and found wide opposition to the destructive mining
practice in all four states and across party lines. The number of voters who oppose mountaintop removal
dwarfs those who support it. The results of the poll indicate
that 57% oppose the practice, and with noticeable intensity (42% strongly
oppose), compared to just 20% who support it (10% strongly supporting).
lin Appalachian
Voices. This North Carolina-based organization opposes
mountaintop removal. From their web
page on MTR, they write: "While the environmental devastation
caused by this practice is obvious, families and communities near these
mining sites are forced to contend with continual blasting from mining
operations that can take place up to 300 feet from their homes and
operate 24 hours a day. Families and communities near
mining sites also suffer from airborne dust and debris, floods that
have left hundreds dead and thousands homeless, and contamination of
their drinking water supplies.
"In central Appalachian counties, which are among the poorest in the
nation, homes are frequently the only asset folks have. Mining
operations have damaged hundreds of homes beyond repair and the value
of homes near a mountaintop removal sites often decrease by as much as
90%. Worst of all, mountaintop removal is threatening not just the
people, forest and mountains of central Appalachia, but the very
culture of the region. Coal companies frequently claim that mountaintop
removal is beneficial for the people, economy and the environment, but
the facts just don't hold up."
Kentucky.
In eastern Kentucky, coal companies now blast as much as 600 feet off
the tops of mountains to reach the seams of coal. Some of the most
biologically diverse and productive temperate hardwood forests in the
world are being eliminated by mountaintop removal, replaced by
"reclaimed" grasslands sewn with exotic, invasive weeds. Coal companies
dump millions of tons of "overburden" (the rock and soil that lies
above a coal seam) into headwater mountain streams in under-regulated
structures called "valley fills." Thousands of underground miner's jobs
have been eliminated as giant machines do the work of hundreds of men. link
Tennessee.
SOCM (Save Our Cumberland Mountains). There is a new
form of
mountaintop removal which is spreading in Tennessee: Cross Ridge
Mining! Like MTR, Cross Ridge Mining operations
will mine through an entire mountain peak and remove an entire seam of
coal. But unlike MTR operations, these Cross Ridge Mines will
not
get a "variance from AOC (approximate original contour)", that is they will not leave the mountain
flat. Instead they propose to remove the mountain and then PUT
IT
BACK AGAIN! In practice, however,
the post-mining rubble is piled in terraces that
cruelly mimic the “original contour” but bear little resemblance
to the pre-mining mountain. Once the mining company
gets its reclamation bond released, the steep terraces
of sterile soil are left to erode into the streams
that flow in nearly every Appalachian holler (see pdf).
Since 2003, permits have been issued to remove the
tops of four mountains in Tennessee. There are 8 more mountains that
can be destroyed, depending on the outcome of a study TVA (Tennessee
Valley Authority) is doing on whether to mine the coal it owns under
the Royal Blue Wildlife Management Area. The Strip Mine Committee is
currently working to stop MTR from spreading in Tennessee. link _______________________________________________ August 2009: Larry Gibson is a leader in the fight against MTR. This
Guardian video/article features the background to the campaign and the
disillusionment with President Obama's lack of action on the
destructive process. While the state of West Virginia implores that
coal is vital, it only comprises 7% of the state's economy - less
significant than Wal-Mart even. Guardian
In memory of Larry Gibson: West
Virginia anti-mining crusader dead at 66. (Septem,ber 2012) In
his decades-long struggle, Gibson brought national attention to mountaintop
removal – described by activists as strip mining on steroids for the epic
destruction it visits on mountains and streams. A diminutive man, who
was not a great orator or well connected, Gibson's courage and persistence won
a roster of celebrities for his cause. Robert Kennedy Jr was a supporter, as
were actor Daryl Hannah and climatologist James Hansen, both of whom were
arrested at mining protests. Guardian
| September 2009: “I am exercising a spiritual obligation as a steward of Creation. It was not
God’s intent that these mountains be destroyed to enhance the wealth of a few
individuals,” said Roland Micklem, 81 one of four citizens blocking Massey Energy’s
regional headquarters in West Virginia. | "It is so critical that we not allow this industry (coal) to
run rampant over our ecosystems. The most vital of all our natural resources is
water and it's more vital than coal." Dr. Ben Stout, aquatic
biologist, Wheeling Jesuit University West Virginia. |
Coal River Mountain
Watch (CRMW) is a grassroots organization begun in
1998 in response to the fear and frustration of people living near or
downstream from huge mountaintop removal site. In December 2009, the late Senator Byrd said: "It is a reality that the practice of mountaintop removal mining has a
diminishing constituency in Washington. It is not a widespread method of mining,
with its use confined to only three states. Most members of Congress, like most
Americans, oppose the practice, and we may not yet fully understand the effects
of mountaintop removal mining on the health of our citizens. West Virginians may
demonstrate anger toward the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over
mountaintop removal mining, but we risk the very probable consequence of
shouting ourselves out of any productive dialogue with EPA and our adversaries
in the Congress. . . I believe that the notion of holding the health care of over 300 million
Americans hostage in exchange for a handful of coal permits is beyond foolish;
it is morally indefensible. It is a non-starter, and puts the entire state of
West Virginia and the coal industry in a terrible light." link
July 2011: 60,000 additional cancer cases linked to MTR.
A new study indicates that the cancer rate in areas where MTR
takes place is twice as high than comparable locations in West Virginia
resulting in 60,000 additional cases among the 1.2 million people
living in the affected counties. link Other site
worth checking: I
love Mountains
|