ECOSYSTEMS
The
climate changes the planet is currently undergoing, and the threats
posed by greenhouse gases, all interlink with the entire planet's
ecosystems which have been carefully balanced for millennia. Since the
industrial age, this has changed, and the way we now exploit the
Earth's resources affect everything in the chain. Forests, wetlands and
oceans have absorbed carbon forever - now with mining, eradicating
forests for agriculture etc., these gasses are building in the
atmosphere and can endure there for a century permitting
ever-increasing rises in temperature, which in turn leads to ice-melt
and rising sea-levels. While world governments and individuals confront
how to reduce energy levels which result in CO2 emissions, the
ecosystems also need to be considered. Deforestation alone can add more
of a threat to global warming than all the cars on the planet's
roads. It's
unfortunately a very complex subject, difficult to summarize in a few
short paragraphs. It has been necessary for us, then, to give more
attention to each of the major ecosystem issues where we can learn what
went wrong, and what must be done to mitigate a looming crisis.
The
four links below each lead to a page for further reading
Recent news:
Jan. 20 2012: If our ecosystem were a valued commodity. Some
of the world's poorest people would be half a trillion dollars a year better
off if the services they provide to the rest of the planet indirectly – through
conserving natural habitats – was given an economic value, a new study has
found. Many of the valuable habitats and species preserved in some of the
world's key biodiversity hotspots are under threat. But the
people who live in these areas lack the means to improve their conservation efforts
according to a new study in the journal BioScience. If poor people were paid
for the services they
provide in they could reap $500bn. There are some fledgling schemes that could
help to raise this cash, for instance, the United Nations-backed system called
Redd (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation), which uses
carbon trading to generate cash to preserve trees, but so far they are small in
scale. link
______________________________________________________________________ July 2011: Between
1850 and 1970 agriculture contributed most CO2. Over the past 150 years,
between 50% and 80% of organic carbon in the topsoil has vanished into the air,
and seven tons of carbon-banking topsoil have been lost for every ton of grain
produced. On close inspection, it seems that the problem isn't the carbon itself,
it's that there's too much in the air and not enough in the ground. When we
consider our CO2 predicament, we tend to fault our love affair with the car and
the fruits of industry. But the greater culprit has been agriculture: since
about 1850, twice as much atmospheric CO2 has derived from farming practices as
from the burning of fossil fuels (the roles crossed around 1970). So, how do we
get that carbon out of the air and back into the soil? Some suggest placing
calcium carbonate or charcoal (aka "biochar") directly into
agricultural soil. But a growing number of soil and agricultural scientists are
also discussing a low-tech, counterintuitive approach to the problem that
depends on a group of unlikely heroes: cows. The catalyst for reducing CO2 and
restoring soil function and fertility, they say, is bringing back the roving,
grazing animals that used to wander the world's grasslands. The natural
processes that take place in the digestive system and under the hooves of
ruminants might be the key to turning deserts back into grasslands and reversing
climate change. In other words, a climate-friendly future might look less like
a geo-engineered landscape and more like, well, "Home on the Range." link
April 2011: New estimates on ecosystem's ability to sequester carbon. A research group has concluded that forests and other terrestrial
ecosystems in the lower 48 states can sequester up to 40% of the nation's
fossil fuel carbon emissions, a larger amount than previously estimated. That's
substantially higher than some previous estimates, which indicated these
ecosystems could take up the equivalent of only about 30% of emissions or less.
There's still some uncertainty in these data, but it does appear that the
terrestrial carbon sink is higher than believed in earlier studies. However,
the scientists cautioned that major disturbances, such as droughts, wildfires
and hurricanes, can all affect the amount of carbon sequestered in a given
year. Large droughts that happened twice in the U.S. in the past decade reduced
the carbon sink about 20%, compared to a normal year. link July 2011: Jellyfish shut down nuclear plants. A nuclear
power station in Israel is shut down by jellyfish, a day after a nuclear
facility in Scotland was closed in a similar incident, amid claims that climate
change is causing a population surge among the species. Scientists
say the number of jellyfish is on the rise due to the increasing acidity of
the world’s oceans driving away the blubbery creatures' natural predators. Ocean
acidification is an often overlooked side effect of burning fossil fuel. Studies
have shown that higher levels of CO2 in the atmosphere doesn’t just trigger
climate change but can make the oceans more acidic. Since the start of the
industrial revolution, acidity levels of the oceans have gone up 30%. link
March 21 2011: New research on ocean's role in trapping CO2. The ocean traps around
30% of the carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere through human activity
and represents, with the terrestrial biosphere, the main carbon sink. The ocean traps
carbon through two principal mechanisms: a biological pump and a physical pump
linked to oceanic currents. Researchers have managed to quantify the role of
these two pumps in an area of the North Atlantic. Contrary to expectations, the
physical pump in this region could be nearly 100 times more powerful on average
than the biological pump. By pulling down masses of water cooled and enriched with
carbon, ocean circulation thus plays a crucial role in deep carbon
sequestration in the North Atlantic. link ___________________________________________________________ January 2011:Amount of carbon absorbed by ecosystem grossly overstated. According to a
new paper published in Science, current carbon accounting methods significantly
overstate the amount of carbon that can be absorbed by forests, plains, and
other terrestrial ecosystems. That is because most current carbon accounting
methods do not consider the methane and carbon dioxide released naturally by
rivers, streams, and lakes. link July 2010: Biodiversity loss poses a greater business risk than climate change.
A long-anticipated UN-backed report warns that the vast majority of
firms are ignoring risks associated with biodiversity loss and
environmental degradation, despite the fact that they pose a serious
and growing threat to their operations. link May 2010: Two UN bodies find massive loss of biodiversity threatened ecosystems. Unless "radical and creative action" is taken quickly to conserve the variety of
life on Earth, natural systems that support lives and livelihoods are at risk of
collapsing, finds a new biodiversity report released today by two United Nations
environmental bodies. The Global Biodiversity Outlook 3 warns that massive further loss of
biodiversity is becoming increasingly likely, and with it, the loss of many
essential services to human societies as several "tipping points" are
approached, in which ecosystems shift to less productive states from which it
may be difficult or impossible to recover. link | Peat:
There is more carbon locked away in the world's peat bogs than in all
the trees put together, and is responsible for 7% of the world's global
emissions from fossil fuels. Yet peat is not recognised by the IPCC
(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) as a being a fossil fuel.
Current fires in Russia indicate the serious threat if peat is ignored
- link |
Soils contain two thirds of the world’s terrestrial carbon reserves, far
more than the forests which sit atop the soils, and their accelerating
degradation is releasing CO2 into the atmosphere in a process that could spiral
out of control. Scientists call this process desertification. The soils in Bolivia
provide a stark case of this advancing problem: almost half the soil in the
nation is being affected. The soils in Bolivia provide a stark case of this advancing
problem: almost half the soil in the nation is being affected. The
Bolivian Science and Technology Ministry recently announced that
“desertification… affects 41% of the national territory, 439,432 square
kilometers, where 77% of the population lives, some 6.4 million
people.” Over 89% of them are poor, following a well-established
pattern in which environmental degradation damages those least able to
adapt to it. Many of the factors that have made the Bolivian soil
desertify, such as deforestation, changes in rain patterns, or a
general lack of water, are indirectly or directly related to climate
change. Desertification occurs as a land-mass dries up, the vegetation
on top the soil withers away, the microbes in the soil die, the
resulting soil erodes, and its carbon migrates into the atmosphere in
the form of CO2. link
|