Facts
  CARBON DIOXIDE 
  METHANE
  NATURAL GAS
  WATER VAPOR 
  COAL
  NUCLEAR
  OFF-SHORE DRILLING
  ETHANOL
   ECOSYSTEMS
   LOCAL - NORTH CAROLINA

COLLEGES & STUDENTS

  Solutions
   WIND POWER
  SOLAR POWER
  WAVE POWER
  GEOTHERMAL
  CONSERVATION
  ELECTRIC VEHICLES
  WHAT CAN YOU DO?

  International
 AUSTRALIA
 BRITAIN
 CANADA
 DENMARK
  SPAIN
 CHINA

CONTACT US

 CARBON DIOXIDE

              - CO2                          


With CO2 now being declared a danger to human health by the US EPA , its significant threat as a greenhouse gas is given added importance as the leading cause of climate change and rising temperatures on the planet. The concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere caused by the combustion of fossil fuels (coal, gas, & oil) has increased by around 40% since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. As the level increases in the atmosphere and the oceans, we're getting further away from the solution. How much we can safely emit is in conflict with how very much more we produce - especially in North America. It's a problem that will be with us, and we need to understand why it's planet Earth's greatest threat. The planet will survive somehow, but will humanity? 

Latest news:

Jan. 12 2012:  EPA publishes first greenhouse gas emissions data from large U.S sources. Power plants were the largest stationary sources of greenhouse gas emissions in the 2010 calendar year, followed by petroleum refineries, according to greenhouse gas emissions data reported to the U.S. EPA by large facilities and suppliers across the country, published for the first time today. Carbon dioxide accounted for the largest share of direct greenhouse gas emissions with 95% followed by methane with four percent, and nitrous oxide and several fluorinated gases accounting for the remaining one percent.link

November 2010: Global CO2 emissions drop by 1.3% to 30.8 billions tons in 2009. . link
May 2011: Worst ever carbon emissions in 2010 leave climate on the brink. link

     ____________________________________________________

The lifetime in the air of CO2, the most significant man-made greenhouse gas, is probably the most difficult to determine, because there are several processes that remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Between 65% and 80% of CO2 released into the air dissolves into the ocean over a period of 20–200 years. The rest is removed by slower processes that take up to several hundreds of thousands of years, including chemical weathering and rock formation. This means that once in the atmosphere, carbon dioxide can continue to affect climate for thousands of years. link

Carbon dioxide levels varied between about 180 and 300 parts per million during the 650,000 years prior to industrialization as recorded in air bubbles trapped in ice in Antarctica. But since industrialization began in the 18th century, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased from about 280 to 390ppm. a rise of about 40%. Globally each year, the land and atmosphere exchanges about 120bn tonnes of carbon, while the oceans and atmosphere transfer about 90bn tonnes of carbon between them. In general this natural carbon cycle is more or less in equilibrium, such that there is no significant net change in the amount of carbon absorbed in the atmosphere, oceans and land. But we also know that human activities, such as burning fossil fuels, producing cement and destroying rainforests, have disturbed the natural equilibrium of the carbon cycle by emitting an additional 7bn tonnes each year. The land and oceans absorb about 45% of this, but the remainder stays in the atmosphere and leads to the annual increases in concentration which have been recorded in the measurements from Mauna Loa, Hawaii, and elsewhere around the world. While the volume of carbon dioxide that is exchanged between natural sources and sinks looks a lot larger, there really is no dispute over human responsibility for the 40% rise in concentrations in the atmosphere. link

       Total estimated U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in 2009 consisted of:
       5,446.8 million metric tons of carbon dioxide - 82.8% of total emissions
       730.9 
million metric tons of methane - 11.1% of total emissions
       219.6
million metric tons of nitrous oxide - 3.3% of total emissions
       178.2
million metric tons of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and               sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) - 2.7% of total emissions  (link) 

      ________________________________________________________________

Interactive climate map and sea-level rise. The Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets (CReSIS) is a Science and Technology Center established by the National Science Foundation (NSF) in 2005, with the mission of developing new technologies and computer models to measure and predict the response of sea level change to the mass balance of ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica. This map shows eight areas around the world, and how they would suffer from rises between 1 and 6 meters. (map)

January 2011:  Carbon Atlas Map. This interactive emissions map shows how the rest of the world compares. New statistics for 2009 show US emissions fell substantially in 2009, to levels not seen since 1995-96, while China surged ahead with an increase of more than 13% on the previous year. Europe, Russia, Canada and South Africa saw their emissions dip, and India has risen to third place. Overall, by these estimates, global emissions fell by a tiny 0.1%. For short periods in the wake of less severe recessions, such as those in 1981-83, and 1991-92, emissions fell more steeply only to continue their upward trend shortly afterwards. link - (2010 figures will take a few months before release.)

Science Daily reports (February 2011) that new research shows that even if all greenhouse gas emissions were stopped now, temperatures would remain higher than pre-Industrial Revolution levels because the greenhouse gases already emitted are likely to persist in the atmosphere for thousands of years. There would continue to be warming even if the most stringent policy proposals were adopted, because there still would be some emission of heat-trapping greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane. It is possible temperatures would continue to escalate even if all cars, heating and cooling systems and other sources of greenhouse gases were suddenly eliminated, said Kyle Armour, a UW doctoral student in physics.

November 2010: Studies show CO2 caused global warming 40 million years ago. New studies show that during the Middle Eocene period temperatures were much higher than today and the warming was accompanied by a doubling in atmospheric CO2 levels. This is the first direct evidence supporting the idea that a recently discovered period of global warming was caused by CO2. link  What caused the rise in CO2 is unknown, though one suggestion is the disappearance of an ocean between India and Asia as the Himalayas rose. 

August 2010: New model sets limits that humans can make. European scientists have developed a new model that specifies the maximum volumes of CO2 that humans may emit to remain below the critical threshold for climate warming of two degrees. According to the model, admissible CO2 emissions will increase from approximately seven billion tonnes of carbon in the year 2000 to a maximum value of around ten billion tonnes in 2015. In order to achieve the long-term stabilisation of the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, the emissions will then have to be reduced by 56% by the year 2050 and approach zero towards the end of this century. link

July 2010: Exploring global movement of CO2.  A NASA-led research team has expanded the growing global armada of remote sensing satellites capable of studying carbon dioxide. Measurements in the region of the atmosphere where CO2 gets transported around the globe are also key to understanding carbon dioxide sources and sinks. link

As of August 2011 CO2  level is 390.02 ppm - up from 371.67 ppm in March 2000        In the last 100,000 years prior to the industrial age, global CO2 levels increased by around 1.5 parts per million. In the last 12 months they have risen by 2.29 ppm. (See current CO2 ppm measurements here.) The most recent science tells us that unless we can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere to 350 parts per million, we will cause huge and irreversible damage to the earth 350.org  That mark was passed in 1988.

Globally, power generation emits nearly 10 billion tons of CO2 per year. The 8,000 power plants in the US spew more than 25% of that -  roughly 2.8 billion tons per year. See the worst dozen power plants in the USA here.

NB: 1 ton - 2,240 lbs   1 tonne (metric) = 1000 kilos or 2200 lbs

The United States burns through 19.5 million barrels of oil a day, 
25% of the world's consumption, more than China, Japan, India and Russia combined. 
That's 2.7 gallons a day for every man, woman and child. 
Also we burn over one billion tons of coal each year
These are the major causes of CO2 emissions.


               
        Timeline on EPA announcements on controlling U.S. GHG emissions:

August 2011: President Obama delays implementation until 2013Business groups and Republican politicians welcomed the decision, while environmentalists condemned the move. President Obama said in a statement: "I have continued to underscore the importance of reducing regulatory burdens and regulatory uncertainty, particularly as our economy continues to recover." The EPA estimated a new smog standard would cost up to $90bn a year - opponents said it would cost more. The rules could also have saved as much as $100bn in health costs, and helped prevent as many as 12,000 premature deaths from heart and lung complications, according to the EPA. link

In May 2010, the EPA announced long-awaited final rules on Greenhouse gases (GHG). The rules anticipate facilities responsible for 70% of the GHGs from stationary sources get permits to operate and show they are using green technology to reduce emissions. The EPA’s phased-in approach was to begin in January 2011, when permitting requirements for GHGs under the Clean Air Act will kick-in for large facilities that are already obtaining permits for other pollutants. These will be required to include GHGs in their permits if they increase these emissions by at least 75,000 tonnes per year (tpy). Then, in July 2011 these requirements will be expanded to cover all new facilities with GHG emissions of at least 100,000 tpy. link   In June 2011, a further delay was announced. link   From the date of the EPA's first proposals in April 2010, manufacturers raised objections, saying that the agency's standards were not based on adequate information, were confusing, and were not technically achievable. In response to the April 2010 proposals, the agency received more than 4,800 comments from businesses and communities, including information that EPA said industry had not provided prior to the proposals. Based on this input, EPA made extensive revisions to the standards, and in December 2010 asked a federal district court for additional time for review to ensure the public's input was fully addressed. The court granted EPA only 30 days and the final rules were issued in February 2011. 

                   ____________________________________

In February 2011, the EPA established Clean Air Act emissions standards for large and small boilers and incinerators that burn solid waste and sewage sludge. The standards cover more than 200,000 boilers and incinerators that emit air pollutants, including mercury, cadmium, dioxins and particle pollution. May 2011 they issued a stay postponing the effective date of emissions standards for major source boilers and commercial and industrial solid waste incinerators. Because the original boiler rule was vacated, there is no rule currently in place. The final rules, published on March 21, 2011, called for an effective date of May 20, 2011 with compliance deadlines beginning three years later. link
See also: US climate agency declares CO2 public danger.  link

                ________________________________________

May 2010: First time action to regulate truck emissions. Currently trucks consume more than two million barrels of oil a day, and average just 6.1 mpg. They emit 20% of the greenhouse gas pollution related to transportation. President Obama estimates that "we can increase fuel economy by as much as 25% in tractor trailers using technologies that already exist today." Obama directed federal officials work with the State of California to develop by September 1, 2010, a technical assessment to inform the rulemaking process. California already has a low carbon vehicles law on the books.The aim is to have a final rule in place by July 30, 2011. link

September 2009: Nation's first vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards announced.  The Obama administration opened a new era in U.S. automotive history by proposing greenhouse gas emissions for vehicles. The emissions standards would be paired with stronger vehicle fuel efficiency standards in a coordinated national program to address climate change and energy security. This is EPA's first action to curb greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, using the authority upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. EPA.  link   [China’s fuel economy standard for passenger cars is equivalent to 36.7 miles per gallon, and China is reportedly considering raising this to 42.2 mpg. The U.S. standard remained at 27.5 mpg for 20 years until President Obama recently announced a new standard in May of 35.5 mpg by 2016.]

October 2009: A new historical record of CO2 levels suggests current political targets on climate may be "playing with fire", scientists say.
Researchers used ocean sediments to plot CO2 levels back to the
Miocene period which began a little over 20 million years ago. Carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere stood at about 400 parts per million (ppm) before beginning to decline about 14 million years ago - a trend that eventually led to formation of the Antarctic icecap and perennial sea ice cover in the Arctic. In the intervening millennia, CO2 concentrations have been much lower; in the last few million years they cycled between 180ppm and 280ppm in rhythm with the sequence of ice ages and warmer interglacial periods. Now, humanity's emissions of greenhouse gases are pushing towards the 400ppm range, which will very likely be reached within a decade. "What we have shown is that in the last period when CO2 levels were sustained at levels close to where they are today, there was no icecap on Antarctica and sea levels were 25-40m (80-130ft) higher," said research leader Aradhna Tripati from the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA). link            

Fossil Fuels’ Hidden Cost Is in Billions, Study Says:
October 2009: Burning fossil fuels costs the United States about $120 billion a year in health costs, mostly because of thousands of premature deaths from air pollution according to a study released by the National Academy of Sciences.
The damages are caused almost equally by coal and oil.  The study ordered by Congress set out to measure the costs not incorporated into the price of a kilowatt-hour or a gallon of gasoline or diesel fuel. The estimates by the academy do not include damages from global warming, which has been linked to the gases from burning fossil fuels link  (This averages to $400 per person in the USA annually.) The study also excludes damage from burning oil for trains, ships and planes and the environmental damage from coal mining or the pollution of rivers with chemicals that were filtered from coal plant smokestacks to keep the air clean.  Read the study here.

    
European countries exceed Kyoto targets.   
November 2009:
A report by the European Environment Agency released today shows that the European Union and all Member States but one [Austria] are on track to meet their Kyoto Protocol commitments to limit and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Whereas the Protocol requires that the EU-15 reduce average emissions during 2008-2010 to 8% below 1990 levels, the latest projections indicate that the EU-15 will go further, reaching a total reduction of more than 13% below the base year. Looking further ahead, almost three quarters of the EU’s unilateral target to cut emissions to 20% below 1990 levels by 2020 could be achieved domestically (i.e. without purchase of credits outside the EU).  link
         _________________________________________________________________
  
 

Where climate change will hit hardest in USA. In 1990, carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere were 354 parts per million (ppm) and increased at a rate of 1.3 ppm per year until reaching a level of 367 ppm in 2000. Between 2000 and today, carbon dioxide concentrations increased at a rate of 2.44 ppm per year until the current level of 392.94ppm (May 2010). If emissions continue at that current rate, carbon dioxide concentrations will exceed 600 ppm by the end of the century. Analyzing data from global climate models compiled for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report, The Nature Conservancy found that over the next 100 years states across the USA could experience average annual temperature increases ranging from nearly 3F to more than 10F. Using the latest scientific data and climate models with geographic information systems (GIS), statistical analysis and web-based mapping services, the Nature Conservancy worked with a wide range of organizations to bring Climate Wizard which represents the first time ever that the full range of climate history and future projections for specific landscapes and time frames have been brought together in a user-friendly format that is available to a mass audience.  link

May 2009Climate change odds much worse than thought  A new MIT study suggests the problem will be about twice as severe as previously estimated six years ago - and could be even worse than that. The new projections, published in the American Meteorological Society's Journal of Climate, indicate a median probability of surface warming of 5.2 degrees Celsius by 2100, with a 90% probability range of 3.5 to 7.4 degrees. This can be compared to a median projected increase in the 2003 study of just 2.4 degrees.  link

How much CO2 are we emitting? 

September 2009: Lord Stern, the economist who produced the single most influential political document on climate change, in a speech at Columbia University later today, was expected to present a report showing the world was on course to reduce overall emissions from today's global total of 50 gigatonnes to 48 gigatonnes. That is not so far off the figure of 44 gigatonnes needed to avoid catastrophic global warming. Emissions, in the absence of the actions so far agreed, would rise to 65 gigatonnes by 2020.   link

For the planet's population, 2 tons per person per year has been an accepted figure for some years - that translates to 13.6 billion tonnes globally, so we are already exceeding that number twofold. U.S. carbon dioxide emissions rose 1.6% in 2007 to a new record according to the EIA. Total U.S. carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels reached 5.984 billion metric tons, up from 5.888 billion metric tons in 2006.  link  

In the USA we produce, therefore, close to 20 tons per person primarily through an energy inefficient lifestyle. A French report in 2006 deemed that humanity must freeze its annual carbon emissions at four billion tons (to maintain a 450 ppm goal) or 0.6 tons for each of the planet's 6.8 billion people, much less than the 2 tons figure. In the USA, therefore, we are either producing 10x too much (according to earlier estimates) or 30x too much (based on the French report). Either way our carbon footprint is causing a serious threat. We can emit some CO2 - its okay - we just produce too much. For all of human history until about 200 years ago, our atmosphere contained 275 parts per million of carbon dioxide; without some CO2 and other greenhouse gases that trap heat in our atmosphere, our planet would be too cold for humans to inhabit.

February 2011: CO2 emissions in U.S. rise. CO2 emissions from US power plants climbed 5.6% in 2010 over the previous year, the biggest annual increase since the EPA began tracking emissions in 1995. Texas power plants led the pack emitting nearly 257 million tons of CO2, as much as the next two states, Florida and Ohio, combined. link  Electricity generators spewed 2.423 billion tons of carbon dioxide in 2010, compared with 2.295 billion tons in 2009. Coal-fired power plants provided 45% of the country’s electricity in 2010, but were responsible for 81% of total CO2 emissions from electricity generation last year. 

September 2011: Global emissions of CO2 increased by 45% between 1990 and 2010, and reached an all-time high of 33 billion tons in 2010. Increased energy efficiency, nuclear energy and the growing contribution of renewable energy are not compensating for the globally increasing demand for power and transport, which is strongest in developing countries. Over the period 1990-2010, in the European Union and Russia CO2 emissions decreased by 7% and 28% respectively, while the USA’s emissions increased by 5% and the Japanese emissions remained more or less constant. There was a 5.8% increase in global CO2 emissions between 2009 and 2010 following a 1% decline in 2009. At present, the USA emits 16.9 tons CO2 per capita per year, over twice as much as Europe with 8.1 tons. By comparison, Chinese per capita CO2 emissions of 6.8 tons are still below the Europe average, but now equal those of Italy. It should be noted that the average figures for China and Europe hide significant regional differences. link  

October 2011: 48 billion tonnes of CO2 released in 2010.  A report, published in the journal Nature Climate Change, suggests that for a "likely" chance (more than 66%) of holding warming below 2C by the end of this century, emissions must peak before 2020. Scientists have warned that a lack of international will means the chances of bringing climate change under control are “slipping out of reach”. Emission levels will also have to drop  to around 44 billion tonnes in 2020, and then keep falling. By 2050, they will need to be well below 1990 levels at around 20 billion tonnes, says the research. This is an ambitious goal. In 2010 emission levels were estimated to be 48 billion tonnes, (much higher than previously reported - see below). If no action is taken to reduce global emissions, experts fear they could grow to 56 billion tonnes in 2020.  link

Hydrofluorocarbons  HFCs are powerful greenhouse gases, and their production is rising by 15% per year.  
   
Black Carbon -Recent studies show that black carbon - microscopic airborne particles commonly known as soot - is also factor in global warming, especially in the Arctic.

CO2 levels rising too sharply

The Kyoto Protocol, which industrialized nations other than the United States have agreed to adhere to, aims to reduce emissions in those countries 5% below 1990 levels by 2012. If we are to have a good chance of achieving that target, the concentration of CO2 must not be allowed to exceed 450 parts per million. To hold the average global temperature rise below   2C relative to its pre-industrial level implies that before 2050 global emissions of CO2 must be reduced to below 50% of the 1990 level (they are currently 10% above that level) link and on current trends could reach 550 ppm by 2035.
The increase in emissions out-paces even the worst-case scenarios published by scientists affiliated with the U.N. The Paris based International Energy Agency (IEA) declared November 7, 2007 that emissions of greenhouse gases will rise by 57% by 2030 compared to current levels, leading to a rise in Earth's surface temperature of at least three degrees Celsius (5.4 degrees Fahrenheit).

November 2009: Global temperatures are on a path to rise by an average of 6C by the end of the century as CO2 emissions increase and the Earth's natural ability to absorb the gas declines, according to a major new study: CO2 emissions have risen by 29% in the past decade alone. The new study is the most comprehensive analysis to date of how economic changes and shifts in the way people have used the land in the past five decades have affected the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. Corinne Le Quéré's work, part of the Global Carbon Project, showed that CO2 emissions from burning fossil fuels increased at an average of 3.4% a year between 2000 and 2008 compared with 1% a year in the 1990s. link   

September 2009: 4C rise now unavoidable: In a dramatic acceleration of forecasts for global warming, UK scientists say the global average temperature could rise by 4C (7.2F) as early as 2060.  link

 

Montreal Protocol - A study in 2007 calculated the climate mitigation benefits of the Montreal ozone treaty, which entered into force on January 1 1989 to prevent depletion of the ozone layer, as totalling the equivalent of 135bn tonnes of C02 since 1990, or a delay in global warming of seven-twelve years. link


June 2010: Positive use of CO2. At algae-to-biofuel facilities across the nation, carbon dioxide is not only not the enemy, it's an essential partner to helping achieve a low-carbon future. CO2 - along with sunlight and water - is needed to grow algae, which can in turn produce oil, otherwise known as “oilgae” or “green crude.” Using CO2 as a catalyst to grow algae is a more viable solution for what to do with the plentiful gas than, for example, sequestering and burying it underground, according to those in the industry. “Putting it underground will not create a market. Finding a way of turning [CO2] into something that can provide value will,” Tim Zenk, said vice president of corporate affairs at Sapphire Energy. link

January 2012: New material for removing CO2 announced.Scientists are reporting discovery of an improved way to remove carbon dioxide from smokestacks and other sources, including the atmosphere. Their report on the process, which achieves some of the highest CO2 removal capacity ever reported for real-world conditions where the air contains moisture, appears in the Journal of the American Chemical Society. Existing methods for removing carbon dioxide from smokestacks and other sources, including the atmosphere, are energy intensive, don't work well and have other drawbacks. In an effort to overcome such obstacles, the group turned to solid materials based on polyethylenimine, a readily available and inexpensive polymeric material. Their tests showed that these inexpensive materials achieved some of the highest CO2 removal rates ever reported for humid air, under conditions that stymie other related materials. After capturing CO2, the materials give it up easily so that it can be used in making other substances, or permanently isolated from the environment. The capture material then can be recycled and reused many times over without losing efficiency. The researchers suggest the materials may be useful on submarines, in smokestacks or out in the open atmosphere, where they could clean up carbon dioxide pollution that comes from small point sources like cars or home heaters, representing about half of the total CO2 emissions related to human activity. link

September 2009: $300 billion cut in fossil fuel subsidies will cut global GHG emissions by 10%.  G-20 Countries Will Phase Out Fossil Fuel Subsidies. At the close of the G-20 summit in Pittsburgh, President Obama said, "We agreed to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels (coal, oil & gas) so that we can transition to a 21st century energy economy - an historic effort that would ultimately phase out nearly $300 billion in global subsidies." link  (Subsidies are hard to eliminate however due to industry's pressure .) 

Geo-engineering

A forest of 100,000 "artificial trees" could be deployed within 10 to 20 years to help soak up the world's carbon emissions. The trees are among three geo-engineering ideas highlighted as practical in a new report. The authors from the Institution of Mechanical Engineers say that without geo-engineering it will be impossible to avoid dangerous climate change. The team studied hundreds of different options but have put forward just three as being practical and feasible using current technology. The authors of this report say that geo-engineering of the type they propose should be used on a short-term basis to buy the world time, but in the long term it is vital to reduce emissions. They define two types of geo-engineering. The first category attempts to cool the planet by reflecting some of the sunlight away. The problem with this is that it just masks the problem. The other type of geo-engineering is to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it.  link

August 2010: Geo-engineering would not prevent sea-level rise - new study

World's Wetlands  - A "Carbon Bomb"

The world's wetlands, threatened by development, dehydration and climate change, could release a planet-warming "carbon bomb" if they are destroyed: Wetlands contain 771 billion tons of greenhouse gases, one-fifth of all the carbon on Earth and about the same amount of carbon as is now in the atmosphere, the scientists said before an international conference linking wetlands and global warming. See wetlands page for more details.


[HOME]
Copyright © 2008 thinkglobalgreen.org   All Rights Reserved
website hosting powered by Charlotte Internet